We use a session cookie and first-party analytics to run this site — no third-party trackers, no ads. Details in our Privacy Policy.
RESEARCH From the Research Desk — The sub-₹100 crore acquisition market, sized. Read it →
Advocate · the public record

Rakesh Kumar

Named in 9 tribunal orders across 9 companies, in cases heard at NCLT New Delhi, NCLT Chandigarh. 6 of those cases have reached an outcome; 2 were still running at the last order on file.

Read from the appearance block of tribunal orders · methodology · report an error

Companies9 named against on the record
Orders9 their name was read from
Benches 2 the cases span this many

Resolved — plan approved

4 companies

A resolution plan was approved by the tribunal in these cases.

Company Commenced Bench Latest order
Shree Radharaman Packaging Private Limited
U25202DL2011PTC224673
Apr 2017New Delhi15 Feb 2018
Cambridge Energy Resources Private Limited
U40106HR2009PTC039660
Mar 2021Chandigarh
Omansh Enterprises Limited
L01100DL1974PLC241646
Jan 2023New Delhi
Wall Rock Infrahome Private Limited
U70109DL2014PTC270537
Dec 2019New Delhi

Dates are printed only where the order carried one. The corpus holds a date on about a third of appearances, and nothing on this page is computed from them.

Liquidation — order passed

2 companies

The tribunal ordered liquidation. Some will since have been dissolved.

Company Commenced Bench Latest order
Praveer Constructions Private Limited
U45201DL1999PTC101672
Oct 2018New Delhi27 Sep 2019
Fantastic Buildcon Private Limited
U45201DL2004PTC131674
Jun 2018New Delhi2 Jul 2019

Dates are printed only where the order carried one. The corpus holds a date on about a third of appearances, and nothing on this page is computed from them.

Under CIRP

2 companies

The process was still running at the last order this site holds.

Company Commenced Bench Latest order
Aryan Ispat and Power Private Limited
U27102DL2003PTC259757
Mar 2024New Delhi
Deviram Restaurants Private Limited
U55209DL2016PTC307351
Jul 2019New Delhi

Dates are printed only where the order carried one. The corpus holds a date on about a third of appearances, and nothing on this page is computed from them.

No case record on file

1 company

The order named this company but the record holds no case for it — usually because the order carried no CIN to join on.

Company Commenced Bench Latest order
pd advisory services llp4 Sep 2020

Dates are printed only where the order carried one. The corpus holds a date on about a third of appearances, and nothing on this page is computed from them.

Where this comes from. This name was read from the appearance block printed at the head of tribunal orders on stressed.in, across resolution orders · scanned resolution orders · liquidation orders · plan-approval orders · admission orders. No name is inferred and none is matched to a register, because none exists. Names that could not be read as a person have been withheld rather than guessed. Methodology · Report an error.