Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AFCAN IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED
U51909GJ2003PTC081238
→ acquired by Naresh Sevantilal Shah
|
IRP · Feb 2021
RP · Mar 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 4y 7mo
to Sep 2025
|
Liquidation — order passed
1Liquidation mandates1on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution01 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUPTA MARRIAGE HALLS PRIVATE LIMITED
U55101DL1996PTC076553
|
Liquidator · Jan 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 16 mo
to Jan 2021
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
2Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: UNITECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED at 452 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
UNITECH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
L99999MH1994PLC082810
Other Services |
RP · Nov 2025
|
452d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
INDIAN TECHNOLIME COMPANY LIMITED
U24112UP1987PLC008776
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Jan 2026
|
235d in extension | Newly admitted |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Voluntary liquidations
1Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Typical time to dissolution1y 8mo
median across every VL on record — none of these mandates has reached dissolution yet
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kolektor Technologies India Private Limited U50500DL2010FTC209307
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Dec 2023 |
— | — | — | in process |
Figures shown where an outcome has been filed. The dated sequence inside a row is read from the tribunal's dissolution order itself, one field at a time, with the page it came from held against it. Regulation 37 (as amended with effect from 31 January 2024) sets 270 days from commencement where the creditors approved the resolution and 90 days where they were not required to — this page does not assign a per-case target, because whether creditors approved is recorded in these orders as prose and has not been classified. The comparison shown is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record: same statistic, same basis.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count4 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome36 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional4
Liquidator1
Voluntary Liquidator1
Of these, 2 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi2 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (777 concluded cases)
Mumbai1 mandate
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,244 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad1 mandate
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 31% resolved (442 concluded cases)
Nitin runs a median 36 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 570 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Trading & Distribution2
Other Services1
Other Manufacturing1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Nitin?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.