Resolved — plan approved
3Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LGCL URBAN HOMES (INDIA) LLP
AAB4374
→ acquired by Nanu Ram Goyal and Co
|
IRP · Nov 2024
RP · Dec 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 14 mo
to Jan 2026
|
|
DREAMZ INFRA INDIA LTD
U70109KA2012PLC062065
→ acquired by Consortium of M/s Bharath Hi Tech Builders Private Limited and M/s Noida Holdings Private Limited ("Successful Resolution Applicant"/"SRA")
|
IRP · Mar 2023
IRP · Mar 2023
IRP · Mar 2023
RP · Apr 2023
RP · Apr 2023
RP · Apr 2023
IRP · Sep 2023
IRP · Sep 2023
IRP · Sep 2023
RP · Oct 2023
RP · Oct 2023
RP · Oct 2023
|
Rs 40 Cr | Rs 16 Cr | 106.2% | 2y 10mo
to Jun 2026
|
|
R P Info Systems Limited
U72200WB2005PLC101512
→ acquired by Consortium of Shri Malay Rohit Kumar Bhow jointly with Genex Enterprise
|
IRP · Feb 2020
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Mar 2020
RP · Mar 2020
IRP · Feb 2024
IRP · Feb 2024
RP · Mar 2024
RP · Mar 2024
|
— | — | — | 2y 4mo
to Jun 2026
|
Liquidation — order passed
105 of 10 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates10on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution55 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value88.7%across 2 cases with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution30 moaverage over 4 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PINK ROSE LINGERIE PRIVATE LIMITED
U18101KA2008PTC045542
|
RP · May 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 10 mo
to Dec 2019
|
|
SUPREME OVERSEAS EXPORTS INDIA PVT LTD.
U19111KA1998PTC024166
|
Liquidator · Apr 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 10mo
to Apr 2024
|
|
Zed Fabs India Private Limited
U28113KA2011PTC056591
|
IRP · Feb 2018
Liquidator · Nov 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 7mo
to Sep 2019
|
|
Bangalore Dehdration and Drying Equipment Co Private Limited
U31909KA1984PTC006352
|
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Feb 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 10mo
to Dec 2021
|
|
METAL CLOSURES PRIVATE LIMITED
U34203KA1977PTC003254
|
Liquidator · Jun 2026
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Sep 2019
|
|
ARS ENERGY PRIVATE LTD
U40100TN1990PTC032178
|
IRP · Feb 2025
RP · Mar 2025
Liquidator · May 2026
|
— | — | — | 15 mo
to May 2026
|
|
BHUVANA INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U45202KA2011PTC056969
|
RP · May 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 10mo
to Dec 2019
|
|
Kavveri Telecom Infrastructure Limited and Ors
U64203KA2008PLC047733
|
RP · Aug 2019
Liquidator · Feb 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 10mo
to Feb 2022
|
|
COMFUND CONSULTING LIMITED
U85110KA1989PLC010626
|
IRP · Feb 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
to Dec 2021
|
|
Panacea Hospitals Pvt. Ltd.
U85110KA2000PTC028064
|
Liquidator · Feb 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 3mo
to Jan 2022
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
3Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: SKYLARK MANSIONS PRIVATE LIMITED at 2,418 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SKYLARK MANSIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
U70101KA1994PTC016487
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Mar 2020
|
2,418d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
CAMSON SEEDS LIMITED
L01200KA2013PLC069985
Food & Agro |
IRP · Apr 2025
|
530d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
HAMSA DAIRY PRIVATE LIMITED
U15202AP2016PTC098421
Food & Agro |
IRP · Nov 2025
RP · Dec 2025
|
318d inside 330d | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
3Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
GOKUL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED
U15424PN2008PLC140027
Food & Agro |
RP · Jun 2026
RP · Jun 2026
|
4y 7mo |
|
Tejkamal Pharmaceuticals Private Limited
U24231KA2008PTC045112
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Nov 2017
RP · Dec 2017
|
8y 9mo |
|
MINDLOGICX INFRATEC LIMITED
U72200KA2010PLC054598
Other Services |
IRP · Jun 2023
|
3y 3mo |
Voluntary liquidations
6Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Median time to dissolution11 mo
across 5 completed · every VL on record runs 1y 8mo
Dissolution orders read2 of 6
the tribunal's own order, field by field — expand a row for the dated sequence
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAILY BREAS GOURMET FOODS (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD U01549KA2003PTC031859
5 dated steps in the orderBengaluru Bench
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Mar 2019 |
Rs 4 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 4 Cr | 1y 8mo to Dec 2020 |
| YENEPOYA ENERGY PVT LTD U40102KA2008PTC047368
8 dated steps in the orderBENGALURU BENCH
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Feb 2025 |
Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | 9 mo to Oct 2025 |
| PEAK TREASURE CAPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED U65929DL2019PTC358600
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Mar 2022 |
— | — | — | in process |
| TELE DNA COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED U72200KA2002PTC030917
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Oct 2022 |
Rs 24 Cr | Rs 24 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | 7 mo to May 2025 |
| GVG FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LTD U74999KA2018PTC111753
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Jan 2019 |
Rs 2 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 2 Cr | 11 mo to Nov 2019 |
| Coinwealth Ventures India Private Limited U74999KA2021PTC154249
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Dec 2023 |
Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | 17 mo to Apr 2025 |
Figures shown where an outcome has been filed. The dated sequence inside a row is read from the tribunal's dissolution order itself, one field at a time, with the page it came from held against it. Regulation 37 (as amended with effect from 31 January 2024) sets 270 days from commencement where the creditors approved the resolution and 90 days where they were not required to — this page does not assign a per-case target, because whether creditors approved is recorded in these orders as prose and has not been classified. The comparison shown is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record: same statistic, same basis.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 5% of 2,365 ranked
At Bengaluru bench — by mandate countTop 5% of 65
Recovery vs liquidation value188.5%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor2 of 2
Typical time to outcome22 months
national median 16 months · median of 13 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional41
Liquidator6
Voluntary Liquidator6
Of these, 12 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Bengaluru15 mandates
Bench median 12 months to outcome · 27% resolved (176 concluded cases)
Amaravati1 mandate
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 28% resolved (54 concluded cases)
Mumbai1 mandate
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,244 concluded cases)
Chennai1 mandate
Bench median 13 months to outcome · 20% resolved (503 concluded cases)
Ramanathan runs a median 22 months to outcome across 13 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 13 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 296 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Real Estate & Housing3
Food & Agro3
Other Manufacturing2
Healthcare2
Textiles & Apparel1
Steel & Metals1
Electronics & Electricals1
Machinery & Equipment1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Ramanathan?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.