Resolved — plan approved
5Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OMKAR SPECIALITY CHEMICALS LIMITED
L24110MH2005PLC151589
→ acquired by Kshitij Polyline Limited
|
RP · Mar 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 7mo
to Jul 2025
|
|
R P Basmati Rice Limited
U15312HR2001PLC034739
→ acquired by Mr. Arvind Kumar and Mr. Bhupinder Singh
|
RP · Jan 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 5mo
to Apr 2022
|
|
Sikka Paper Limited and Ors
U21012DL1984PLC128665
→ acquired by Mr. Naresh Gill
|
IRP · Apr 2019
RP · May 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 11mo
to Apr 2022
|
|
RUKMINI IRON PRIVATE LIMITED
U22109DL2004PTC125131
→ acquired by Mr. Sanjay Kejriwal and Ors
|
IRP · May 2022
RP · Jun 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 18 mo
to Nov 2023
|
|
JADOUN INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
U52190RJ2012PTC038237
|
IRP · Jan 2019
RP · Feb 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 3mo
to May 2021
|
Liquidation — order passed
4Liquidation mandates4on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution04 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESKAY K 'N' IT (INDIA) LIMITED
L18109DN1987PLC000034
|
RP · Jun 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 5y 9mo
to Nov 2025
|
|
Saisons Trade & Industry Pvt Ltd
U24100MH1999PTC121908
|
Liquidator · May 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to May 2023
|
|
Hipad Technology India Private Limited
U32109UP2016FTC085883
|
RP · Jan 2021
Liquidator · Jul 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 7 mo
to Jul 2021
|
|
Geo Express Private Limited
U63011DL2006PTC145775
|
IRP · Jan 2018
RP · Mar 2018
Liquidator · Oct 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 8 mo
to Oct 2018
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
8Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Preet Tractors Private Limited at 3,287 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Preet Tractors Private Limited
U29211PB2001PTC024193
Machinery & Equipment |
IRP · Oct 2017
RP · Nov 2017
|
3,287d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
Rathi TMT Saria Private Limited
U27109DL2003PTC118794
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Apr 2019
RP · May 2019
|
2,719d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
THREE C PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U70200DL2010PTC205607
Real Estate & Housing |
RP · Aug 2022
|
2,585d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
Lokhandwala Infrastructure Private Limited
U45200MH2006PTC158561
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Sep 2019
|
2,563d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
SVMR Logistics Private Limited
U74140DL2013PTC261227
Other Services |
IRP · Jan 2020
|
2,452d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
K-Lifestyle & Industries Limited
L74999DN1987PLC000035
Other Services |
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Mar 2020
|
2,424d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
Yashraj Containeurs Limited
L28120MH1993PLC073160
Steel & Metals |
RP · Apr 2024
|
946d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
JASMINE BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED
U45400DL2010PTC202195
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Sep 2019
IRP · Sep 2019
|
934d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
2Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
SAROHA PRINTING & PACKAGING PRIVATE LIMITED
U22190DL2012PTC244120
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Sep 2022
|
4y |
|
Lokhandwala Kataria Construction Private Limited
U45200MH1998PTC117468
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Sep 2019
|
9y 3mo |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 10% of 2,570 ranked
At New Delhi bench — by mandate countTop 5% of 432
Recovery vs liquidation value127.8%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor4 of 5
Typical time to outcome27 months
national median 16 months · median of 9 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional26
Liquidator3
Of these, 12 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi8 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Mumbai5 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad2 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (447 concluded cases)
Chandigarh2 mandates
Bench median 20 months to outcome · 37% resolved (210 concluded cases)
Ajit runs a median 27 months to outcome across 9 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 292 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Manufacturing5
Construction & Infrastructure3
Other Services2
Machinery & Equipment2
Textiles & Apparel1
Chemicals & Plastics1
Steel & Metals1
Food & Agro1
Trying to reach Ajit?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.