Resolved — plan approved
2Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHEEL AUTO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U35921PB1998PTC019424
→ acquired by Mr. Ramdhan Gupta
|
RP · Oct 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 8mo
to May 2025
|
|
BYRNIHAT COAL PRIVATE LIMITED
U51909AS2005PTC007678
→ acquired by Mrs. Sapna Singhal
|
IRP · Apr 2022
RP · Apr 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 10 mo
to Feb 2023
|
Liquidation — order passed
61 of 6 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates6on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution15 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value52.7%across 1 case with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution20 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHRI TRADCO DEESAN PRIVATE LIMITED
U15400MH2010PTC203313
|
Liquidator · May 2026
Liquidator · May 2026
|
— | — | — | 5y 9mo
to May 2026
|
|
RAM LAL ANEJA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED
U15400PB2010PTC033665
|
IRP · Jan 2023
RP · Feb 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 6mo
to Aug 2025
|
|
SWANI MOTORS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
U34103PB2008PTC031761
|
IRP · Mar 2023
RP · Mar 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 9mo
to Jul 2025
|
|
EMERGENT TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U51909DL2004PTC129443
|
RP · Apr 2022
IRP · Apr 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 1mo
to May 2025
|
|
EARTH WATER LIMITED
U74899DL2001PLC111383
|
IRP · Feb 2021
RP · Mar 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 11mo
to Jan 2023
|
|
HONEST DERIVATIVES PRIVATE LIMITED
U93000GJ2007PTC051271
|
Liquidator · Oct 2025
Liquidator · Oct 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 5y 4mo
to Oct 2025
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
7Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: ATUL PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED at 1,155 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ATUL PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
U45200MH2007PTC173576
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Aug 2023
|
1,155d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
BEE K BEE PRINTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U74994DL1993PTC053687
Other Services |
IRP · Apr 2024
RP · May 2024
|
890d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
M2M Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
U70109DL2012PTC242480
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Mar 2025
RP · May 2025
|
547d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
VENTURE SUPPLY CHAIN PRIVATE LIMITED
U60300DL2014PTC273346
Logistics & Transport |
RP · Nov 2025
|
449d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
USHDEV WINDPARK PRIVATE LIMITED
U40300TN2012PTC088608
Power & Energy |
RP · Feb 2026
|
343d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
Shree Shiddhanath Cotex Private Limited
U01405GJ2008PTC053324
Food & Agro |
IRP · Jan 2026
RP · Feb 2026
|
244d in extension | Inviting EoI |
|
Mhow Ghatabill Toll Roads Private Limited
U45203DL2011PTC223896
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Jul 2026
|
75d within 180d | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
3Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
SGM STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED
U27310DL2007PTC169617
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Mar 2022
RP · May 2022
|
4y 6mo |
|
Desein Private Limited
U74899DL1970PTC005474
Other Services |
IRP · Jan 2022
|
4y 7mo |
|
APEX ELECTRO DEVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
U74899DL1994PTC062178
Other Services |
IRP · Jun 2021
|
5y 3mo |
Voluntary liquidations
2Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Median time to dissolution1y 6mo
across 1 completed · every VL on record runs 1y 8mo
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiserv Solutions International Private Limited U72200DL2013FTC253678
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Feb 2021 |
Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | 1y 6mo to Sep 2022 |
| Cango Networks Private Limited U72300TN2009PTC070935
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Jan 2023 |
— | — | — | in process |
Figures shown where an outcome has been filed. The dated sequence inside a row is read from the tribunal's dissolution order itself, one field at a time, with the page it came from held against it. Regulation 37 (as amended with effect from 31 January 2024) sets 270 days from commencement where the creditors approved the resolution and 90 days where they were not required to — this page does not assign a per-case target, because whether creditors approved is recorded in these orders as prose and has not been classified. The comparison shown is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record: same statistic, same basis.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 10% of 2,365 ranked
At Mumbai bench — by mandate countTop 10% of 438
Recovery vs liquidation value103.4%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 2
Typical time to outcome35 months
national median 16 months · median of 8 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional25
Liquidator4
Voluntary Liquidator2
Of these, 13 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi9 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (777 concluded cases)
Chandigarh3 mandates
Bench median 20 months to outcome · 37% resolved (210 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad2 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (445 concluded cases)
Mumbai2 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,247 concluded cases)
Akhil runs a median 35 months to outcome across 8 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 538 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Services5
Food & Agro3
Construction & Infrastructure2
Trading & Distribution2
Other Manufacturing1
Machinery & Equipment1
Auto & Components1
Power & Energy1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Akhil?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.