Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHARMING APPARELS PRIVATE LIMITED
U51101DL1991PTC042923
→ acquired by Mr. Sanjay Singhal
|
IRP · Dec 2017
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 2mo
to Feb 2020
|
Liquidation — order passed
31 of 3 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates3on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution12 still in process
Order to dissolution19 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
J H V DISTILLERIES & SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
U15424WB2002PLC094242
|
IRP · May 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Feb 2019
|
|
RATANDEEP INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
U45400UP2012PTC050971
|
IRP · Apr 2019
RP · Jun 2019
Liquidator · Jan 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 9mo
to Jan 2022
|
|
VRJ TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U74899DL2001PTC112955
|
IRP · Dec 2021
RP · May 2022
Liquidator · Sep 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Sep 2022
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: PREMIA PROJECTS LIMITED at 3,037 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PREMIA PROJECTS LIMITED
U45200DL2012PLC235075
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · May 2018
|
3,037d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Voluntary liquidations
1Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Median time to dissolution1y 10mo
across 1 completed · every VL on record runs 1y 8mo
Dissolution orders read1 of 1
the tribunal's own order, field by field — expand a row for the dated sequence
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAI MAA VAISHNO LOHA PRIVATE LIMITED U27310UP2007PTC033668
5 dated steps in the orderALLAHABAD BENCH, PRAYAGRAJ
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Mar 2020 |
Rs 4 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 4 Cr | 1y 10mo to Jan 2022 |
Figures shown where an outcome has been filed. The dated sequence inside a row is read from the tribunal's dissolution order itself, one field at a time, with the page it came from held against it. Regulation 37 (as amended with effect from 31 January 2024) sets 270 days from commencement where the creditors approved the resolution and 90 days where they were not required to — this page does not assign a per-case target, because whether creditors approved is recorded in these orders as prose and has not been classified. The comparison shown is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record: same statistic, same basis.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count5 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value98.5%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor0 of 1
Typical time to outcome18 months
national median 16 months · median of 4 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional7
Liquidator2
Voluntary Liquidator1
Of these, 5 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi3 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (777 concluded cases)
Kolkata1 mandate
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 33% resolved (529 concluded cases)
Allahabad1 mandate
Bench median 22 months to outcome · 44% resolved (101 concluded cases)
Alok runs a median 18 months to outcome across 4 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is moving at the pace of his own forums, within a month either way.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Construction & Infrastructure2
Food & Agro1
Trading & Distribution1
Other Services1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Alok?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.