Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kei-Rsos Maritime Limited
U61100AP1999PLC032961
→ acquired by M/s.Divetech Marine Engineering Services Private Limited, with Divetech Marine Engineering Services LLC, Dubai acting as the Financial Sponsor
|
IRP · Aug 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 4mo
to Jan 2022
|
Liquidation — order passed
21 of 2 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution11 still in process
Order to dissolution45 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Powercon Projects and Association Limited
U31909OR2004PLC007584
|
IRP · Jul 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 6 mo
to Jan 2019
|
|
C View Innovations Private Limited
U32300DL2015PTC286099
|
IRP · Jun 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 11mo
to May 2022
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: ABW Infrastructrue Limited at 2,572 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ABW Infrastructrue Limited
U45201DL2003PLC120136
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Sep 2019
|
2,572d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count4 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value143.9%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 1
Typical time to outcome28 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional4
Of these, 4 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi2 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (776 concluded cases)
Kolkata1 mandate
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 33% resolved (528 concluded cases)
Hyderabad1 mandate
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 37% resolved (346 concluded cases)
Anand runs a median 28 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 16 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 381 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Machinery & Equipment2
Construction & Infrastructure1
Logistics & Transport1
Trying to reach Anand?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.