Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Digicable Network (India) Limited
U74999MH2007PLC171246
→ acquired by Mr. Madhav Dhir
|
IRP · Mar 2021
RP · Apr 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 1mo
to Jan 2023
|
Liquidation — order passed
1Liquidation mandates1on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution01 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pratibha lndustries Limited
L45200MH1995PLC090760
|
RP · Mar 2019
Liquidator · Nov 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y
to Feb 2021
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Nitco Ltd at 2,421 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nitco Ltd
L26920MH1966PLC016547
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Feb 2020
|
2,421d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count3 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value81.6%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor0 of 1
Typical time to outcome25 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional4
Liquidator1
Of these, 2 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai2 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Anil runs a median 25 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 201 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Manufacturing1
Construction & Infrastructure1
Other Services1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Anil?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.