Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STRAIGHT EDGE CONTRACTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U45400DL2009PTC197467
→ acquired by Noida Shopping Centre Private Limited
|
RP · Nov 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 7mo
to Oct 2022
|
Liquidation — order passed
22 of 2 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution20 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value84.6%across 2 cases with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution48 moaverage over 2 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANG INDUSTRIES LIMITED
L51909DL1991PLC045084
|
Liquidator · Oct 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Feb 2019
|
|
PATNAZI POWER LIMITED
U74999DL2013PLC251812
|
IRP · Jan 2019
RP · Feb 2019
Liquidator · Jan 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to Jan 2020
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count3 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value75.7%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor0 of 1
Typical time to outcome17 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional3
Liquidator2
Of these, 1 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi3 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Ankit runs a median 17 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is moving at the pace of his own forums, within a month either way.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Trading & Distribution1
Construction & Infrastructure1
Other Services1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Ankit?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.