Liquidation — order passed
52 of 5 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates5on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution23 still in process
Order to dissolution19 moaverage over 2 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VISTAR METAL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U27101MH2009PTC192733
|
IRP · Oct 2019
RP · Dec 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 8mo
to Jul 2023
|
|
CG POWER SOLUTIONS LIMITED
U40300MH2012PLC228170
|
IRP · Apr 2022
RP · Jul 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 6mo
to Nov 2023
|
|
DHARAM PAUL METAL PRIVATE LIMITED
U51420MH2005PTC152167
|
Liquidator · Oct 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 7 mo
to May 2019
|
|
Kalisma Steel Private Limited
U52100MH2011PTC222943
|
IRP · Aug 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 7mo
to Mar 2021
|
|
AJS Impex Private Limited
U74900MH2006PTC161680
|
IRP · Jul 2022
RP · Aug 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 9mo
to Apr 2024
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Kumar Urban Development Private Limited at 1,977 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kumar Urban Development Private Limited
U70101PN1993PTC072139
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Apr 2021
|
1,977d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count6 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome20 months
national median 16 months · median of 5 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional8
Liquidator1
Of these, 5 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai6 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,250 concluded cases)
Atul runs a median 20 months to outcome across 5 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 43 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Trading & Distribution2
Other Manufacturing1
Power & Energy1
Real Estate & Housing1
Other Services1
Trying to reach Atul?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.