Liquidation — order passed
2Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution02 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vivid IT Solutions Private Limited
U72900DL2010PTC198192
|
RP · Feb 2019
Liquidator · Apr 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 6 mo
to Apr 2019
|
|
V S MATRIX PRIVATE LIMITED
U74899DL1990PTC040510
|
RP · May 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 5y 11mo
to Aug 2025
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
3Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: ACE FOOTMARK PRIVATE LIMITED at 1,132 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ACE FOOTMARK PRIVATE LIMITED
U19201DL2000PTC106650
Textiles & Apparel |
IRP · Aug 2023
|
1,132d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
ORKUS PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999DL2017PTC313952
Other Services |
IRP · Dec 2023
|
1,020d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
SAKRIYA TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U33110DL2013PTC262725
Electronics & Electricals |
IRP · Mar 2025
|
544d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
1Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
Cargo Solar Power (Gujarat) Private Limited
U40106DL2010PTC203686
Power & Energy |
IRP · Jul 2018
|
8y 2mo |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count5 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome39 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional6
Liquidator1
Of these, 4 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi6 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (777 concluded cases)
Bimal runs a median 39 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 659 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Services3
Textiles & Apparel1
Electronics & Electricals1
Power & Energy1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Bimal?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.