Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shree Rudra Shakti Industries Private Limited
U17100TG1993PTC016235
→ acquired by Mr.Samala Raja Shekar
|
RP · Dec 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 5y 11mo
to Apr 2025
|
Liquidation — order passed
22 of 2 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution20 still in process
Order to dissolution133 daysaverage over 2 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sri Maruthi Digitals Private Limited
U74900TG2014PTC095806
|
IRP · Jun 2019
RP · Aug 2019
Liquidator · Dec 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 5 mo
to Dec 2019
|
|
LUPIN TELEPOWER PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999TG2009PTC065813
|
IRP · Mar 2019
RP · Apr 2019
Liquidator · Jun 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3 mo
to Jun 2019
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Fans Asia Private Limited at 1,071 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fans Asia Private Limited
U29306AP2009PTC065572
Machinery & Equipment |
IRP · May 2019
IRP · May 2019
RP · Jun 2019
RP · Jun 2019
|
1,071d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
5Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
PANDA DAIRY PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U15200AP2014PTC092541
Food & Agro |
IRP · Sep 2020
|
6y 1mo |
|
IRIS ELECTRO OPTICS PRIVATE LIMITED
U33203TG2015PTC099001
Machinery & Equipment |
IRP · Mar 2019
RP · May 2019
|
7y 5mo |
|
RANGA PARTICLE BOARD INDUSTRIES LIMITED
U36912TG2010PLC070284
|
IRP · Apr 2019
|
7y 5mo |
|
SRI JYOTI RENEWABLE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED
U40108AP2008PTC058949
Power & Energy |
IRP · Mar 2019
RP · May 2019
|
7y 6mo |
|
MAAVE ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999TG2007PTC055355
Other Services |
IRP · Mar 2021
|
5y 6mo |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 20% of 2,570 ranked
At Hyderabad bench — by mandate countTop 20% of 131
Typical time to outcome5 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional16
Liquidator2
Of these, 8 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Hyderabad7 mandates
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 38% resolved (348 concluded cases)
Amaravati2 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 27% resolved (55 concluded cases)
Chakravarthi runs a median 5 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 15 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is closing 277 days faster than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Services3
Machinery & Equipment2
Food & Agro1
Textiles & Apparel1
Power & Energy1
Trying to reach Chakravarthi?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.