Liquidation — order passed
21 of 2 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution11 still in process
Order to dissolution174 daysaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kasata Hometech (India) Private Limited
U45202MH2009PTC194229
|
IRP · Oct 2019
IRP · Aug 2021
RP · Sep 2021
Liquidator · Aug 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to Aug 2022
|
|
EBUSINESSWARE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
U72900HR1999PTC035346
|
IRP · May 2020
RP · Jun 2020
Liquidator · Sep 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 8mo
to Feb 2023
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
6Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: GREENS FARM TECH PRIVATE LIMITED at 2,408 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GREENS FARM TECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U01403KA2009PTC049017
Food & Agro |
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Jun 2020
|
2,408d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
TIERRA FARM ASSETS COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
U01400KA2012PTC062976
Food & Agro |
IRP · Apr 2022
RP · May 2022
|
1,631d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
KASHISH DEVELOPERS LIMITED
U74300JH2001PLC012131
Other Services |
IRP · Nov 2019
IRP · Nov 2019
|
1,466d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
SAI SHRADDHA VIVEK PROJECTS DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U70102MH2007PTC168056
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Sep 2022
|
1,458d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
JASMINE BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED
U45400DL2010PTC202195
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Dec 2019
IRP · Dec 2019
|
933d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
REAL TECH CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
U45201DL2005PTC140281
Construction & Infrastructure |
RP · Jul 2025
|
514d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
2Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
M K Infrastructure Private Limited
U45309WB2004PTC100620
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Feb 2020
|
6y 7mo |
|
GRADIENT BUSINESS CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED
U74140WB2012PTC217608
Other Services |
IRP · Aug 2020
|
6y |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 20% of 2,308 ranked
At New Delhi bench — by mandate countTop 20% of 420
Typical time to outcome22 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional17
Liquidator2
Of these, 9 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Kolkata3 mandates
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 33% resolved (530 concluded cases)
Bengaluru2 mandates
Bench median 12 months to outcome · 27% resolved (177 concluded cases)
New Delhi2 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Mumbai2 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Jugraj runs a median 22 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 15 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 207 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Construction & Infrastructure4
Other Services3
Food & Agro2
Real Estate & Housing1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Jugraj?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.