Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Prithvi Multipurpose Cold Storage Private Limited
U63022RJ2006PTC022885
→ acquired by Suspended Directors of Corporate Debtor: Mr. Punam Sirohia, Mr. Pukhraj Sirohia, Mr. Rajnish Raj Sirohia
|
IRP · Aug 2019
RP · Sep 2019
Liquidator · Mar 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 4y 6mo
to Feb 2024
|
Liquidation — order passed
2Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution02 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Manan Apparels Limited
U18100MH2005PLC155531
|
RP · Apr 2024
Liquidator · Jan 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to Jan 2025
|
|
Guman Furniture And Services Private Limited
U51393RJ2001PTC016964
|
IRP · Mar 2019
RP · Apr 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 7 mo
to Oct 2019
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
2Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Simna Exim India Private Limited at 643 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Simna Exim India Private Limited
U14200RJ2013PTC042248
Mining |
IRP · Dec 2024
RP · Jan 2025
|
643d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
ZUSAK EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED
U51909MH2017PTC300291
Trading & Distribution |
IRP · Aug 2025
RP · Sep 2025
|
405d past 330d limit | Newly admitted |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
5Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
ADIG JEMTEX PRIVATE LIMITED
U17119RJ2010PTC033650
Textiles & Apparel |
RP · Aug 2021
|
5y 3mo |
|
Aarti Suitings Pvt. Ltd.
U18108RJ1994PTC007997
Textiles & Apparel |
RP · Aug 2021
|
5y 3mo |
|
Forts Biotech Private Limited
U24232RJ2010PTC033295
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Mar 2019
RP · Apr 2019
|
7y 6mo |
|
DEEJAY DYNAMIX EXPLOSIVES PRIVATE LIMITED
U24292RJ1987PTC003882
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · May 2023
RP · Jun 2023
|
3y 4mo |
|
PPAGRO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
U51224RJ2014PTC045480
Trading & Distribution |
IRP · Jan 2023
RP · Feb 2023
|
3y 8mo |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count5 mandates on record
At Jaipur bench — by mandate countTop 20% of 46
Recovery vs liquidation value338.5%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 1
Typical time to outcome12 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional17
Liquidator2
Of these, 7 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Jaipur8 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 39% resolved (75 concluded cases)
Mumbai2 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Kamal runs a median 12 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is closing 153 days faster than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Textiles & Apparel3
Trading & Distribution3
Other Manufacturing2
Mining1
Logistics & Transport1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Kamal?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.