Liquidation — order passed
31 of 3 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates3on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution12 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value92.4%across 2 cases with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution27 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRK FOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U15122TG2011PTC075321
|
IRP · Sep 2019
RP · Nov 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 6mo
to Mar 2021
|
|
Makro Cast Private Limited
U27109AP2004PTC043747
|
IRP · Dec 2019
RP · Jan 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 4y 10mo
to Oct 2024
|
|
SUNSHINE INFRAENGINEERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
U45203AP2010PTC070070
|
Liquidator · Oct 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 10 mo
to Oct 2019
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: S L S POWER CORPORATION LIMITED at 538 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
S L S POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
U40109AP2005PLC047008
Power & Energy |
IRP · Apr 2025
RP · May 2025
|
538d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count4 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome18 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional6
Liquidator1
Of these, 3 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Hyderabad2 mandates
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 37% resolved (346 concluded cases)
Amaravati2 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 27% resolved (55 concluded cases)
Kammula runs a median 18 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 15 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 106 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Food & Agro1
Other Manufacturing1
Power & Energy1
Construction & Infrastructure1
Trying to reach Kammula?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.