Resolved — plan approved
4Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JIYA ECO-PRODUCTS LIMITED
L01111GJ2011PLC068414
→ acquired by Pradeep Kumar Khandagale
|
IRP · May 2023
RP · Jun 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 7mo
to Dec 2024
|
|
B.P. BANSAL AGRITECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U01110MP2012PTC028452
→ acquired by Dr. Sita Ram Bansal
|
IRP · Dec 2022
RP · May 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 6mo
to Jun 2025
|
|
GOLDEN WEALTH ADVISORY PRIVATE LIMITED
U74110MH2012PTC237832
→ acquired by Mr. Suraj Kukreja / Mr. Suraj Harish Kukreja
|
IRP · Aug 2024
RP · Sep 2024
|
— | — | — | 1y 11mo
to Aug 2026
|
|
RUSHABH PRECISION BEARINGS LIMITED
U99999MH1989PTC053093
→ acquired by REAL MAZON INDIA LIMITED
|
IRP · Apr 2022
RP · Jul 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 18 mo
to Oct 2023
|
Liquidation — order passed
102 of 10 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates10on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution28 still in process
Order to dissolution15 moaverage over 2 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHREE RAMRAJYA COTEX PRIVATE LIMITED
U01403GJ2007PTC051608
|
IRP · Feb 2023
RP · Mar 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Nov 2023
|
|
SHREE RAM COTTEX INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U17200GJ2013PTC076858
|
IRP · Jul 2023
RP · Aug 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 3mo
to Oct 2025
|
|
RAMDEV PVC PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U25111GJ2013PTC077004
|
IRP · Feb 2023
RP · Mar 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 7 mo
to Aug 2023
|
|
GOKUL CERAMIC PRIVATE LIMITED
U26914GJ2003PTC043228
|
RP · Mar 2021
Liquidator · Jun 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Jun 2022
|
|
Gangotri Glazed Tiles Private Limited
U26916GJ2007PTC051437
|
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Mar 2020
Liquidator · Nov 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Nov 2020
|
|
Vivek Steelco Private Limited
U27109GJ2009PTC056434
|
RP · Jan 2021
Liquidator · Jul 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 9mo
to Jul 2023
|
|
NIZAMIYA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
U45201GJ1998PTC034481
|
IRP · Apr 2021
RP · May 2021
Liquidator · Jan 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Jan 2022
|
|
SAGAR AUTOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U50500MP2009PTC022313
|
IRP · Jun 2022
RP · Jul 2022
Liquidator · May 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 10 mo
to Apr 2023
|
|
CLS Enterprise Private Limited
U63020GJ2005PTC047148
|
IRP · Jan 2020
RP · Feb 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Sep 2020
|
|
Orient Spa Limited
U85100GJ2008PLC052614
|
IRP · Apr 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
to Jun 2020
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: LAURENT TILES PRIVATE LIMITED at 2,410 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LAURENT TILES PRIVATE LIMITED
U26933GJ2003PTC043058
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Feb 2020
|
2,410d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
2Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
OYO Hotels and Homes Private Limited
U74900GJ2015PTC107035
Other Services |
IRP · Mar 2021
|
5y 5mo |
|
Productive Creations (India) Private Limited
U80903GJ2018PTC101912
Other Services |
IRP · Nov 2020
RP · Dec 2020
|
5y 10mo |
Voluntary liquidations
9Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Median time to dissolution1y 6mo
across 8 completed · every VL on record runs 1y 8mo
Dissolution orders read4 of 9
the tribunal's own order, field by field — expand a row for the dated sequence
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAVI COTTEX PRIVATE LIMITED U17100GJ2013PTC075107
6 dated steps in the orderAhmedabad Bench Court II
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Jan 2022 |
Rs 2 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 2 Cr | 18 mo to Jul 2023 |
| STAR MACHINE ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED U29100GJ2007PTC051257
6 dated steps in the orderAhmedabad Bench Court 1
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Mar 2019 |
Rs 1 Cr | — | Rs 1 Cr | 1y 6mo to Oct 2020 |
| CHINA STEEL MACHINERY CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED U29100GJ2013FTC076107
5 dated steps in the orderAhmedabad Bench
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Apr 2018 |
Rs 4 Cr | — | Rs 3 Cr | 13 mo to May 2019 |
| DEVREKHA ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED U29259GJ1991PTC015634
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Apr 2019 |
Rs 1 Cr | — | Rs 1 Cr | 1y 7mo to Nov 2020 |
| SURYAM PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED U45201GJ2010PTC059483
7 dated steps in the orderAhmedabad Bench Court 1
|
Voluntary Liquidator · May 2019 |
Rs 11 Cr | — | Rs 11 Cr | 1y 10mo to Mar 2021 |
| CHIDANAND MULTICOMMODITIES LIMITED U51100GJ2005PLC046079
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Jun 2025 |
Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | 11 mo to May 2026 |
| MIRTO TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED U51909GJ2019PTC108405
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Aug 2024 |
Rs 1 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | 1y 8mo to Apr 2026 |
| CHIDANAND SHARE AND STOCK SERVICES LIMITED U67120GJ1996PLC029582
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Jun 2025 |
— | — | — | in process |
| ZEB IT SERVICE LIMITED U72900GJ2015PLC083609
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Jan 2020 |
Rs 4 Cr | Rs 1 Cr | Rs 3 Cr | 2y 8mo to Sep 2022 |
Figures shown where an outcome has been filed. The dated sequence inside a row is read from the tribunal's dissolution order itself, one field at a time, with the page it came from held against it. Regulation 37 (as amended with effect from 31 January 2024) sets 270 days from commencement where the creditors approved the resolution and 90 days where they were not required to — this page does not assign a per-case target, because whether creditors approved is recorded in these orders as prose and has not been classified. The comparison shown is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record: same statistic, same basis.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 5% of 2,567 ranked
At Ahmedabad bench — by mandate countTop 5% of 132
Recovery vs liquidation value140.4%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor2 of 3
Typical time to outcome16 months
national median 16 months · median of 14 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional29
Liquidator5
Voluntary Liquidator9
Of these, 15 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Ahmedabad13 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (446 concluded cases)
Indore2 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 49% resolved (35 concluded cases)
Mumbai2 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,250 concluded cases)
Keyur runs a median 16 months to outcome across 14 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 16 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is moving at the pace of his own forums, within a month either way.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Manufacturing5
Other Services5
Food & Agro3
Chemicals & Plastics1
Construction & Infrastructure1
Trading & Distribution1
Logistics & Transport1
Trying to reach Keyur?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.