Resolved — plan approved
2Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PARSHURAM FORGE PRIVATE LIMITED
U27200MH1984PTC034543
→ acquired by Prashant Shridhar Vaidya (Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor) / Mr. Prashant Vaidya
|
IRP · Apr 2019
RP · May 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 4y 9mo
to Feb 2024
|
|
Trinity Auto Components Limited
U34300PN1985PLC037909
→ acquired by M/s. Tarini Steel through Mr. Santosh Agarwal, one of the Directors of the Corporate Debtor
|
IRP · May 2017
RP · Jul 2017
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 8 mo
to Jan 2018
|
Liquidation — order passed
146 of 14 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates14on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution68 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value97.7%across 4 cases with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution23 moaverage over 6 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Trans-Fab Power lndia Private Limited
U00360PN2006PTC022339
|
IRP · Sep 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 9mo
to Jun 2023
|
|
BHADRAMARUTI CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED
U27100MH2004PTC148361
|
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Mar 2020
Liquidator · Apr 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 2mo
to Apr 2022
|
|
Ramdas Ispat and Metal Private Limited and Ors
U27105PN1998PTC114019
|
IRP · Apr 2018
RP · Jul 2018
Liquidator · Oct 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 7 mo
to Oct 2018
|
|
AWATE ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED
U27106PN2008PTC132238
|
IRP · Mar 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 11mo
to Mar 2024
|
|
Hi-Tech Electromech Private Limited
U31200PN2009PTC134211
|
IRP · Oct 2019
RP · Dec 2019
Liquidator · Mar 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Mar 2021
|
|
Bhavya Infrastructure (India) Private Limited
U45200MH2005PTC150796
|
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Jul 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 7mo
to Oct 2023
|
|
Liveminds Solutions Private Limited
U51909MH2005PTC157321
|
IRP · Jan 2020
RP · Feb 2020
Liquidator · Feb 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 13 mo
to Feb 2021
|
|
Kale Infra Projects Private Limited
U70102PN2009PTC134437
|
IRP · May 2019
RP · May 2019
Liquidator · Dec 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 7mo
to Dec 2020
|
|
Hitech Engineering Corporation India Private Limited
U74200PN2008PTC132311
|
IRP · Feb 2018
RP · Mar 2018
Liquidator · Oct 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Oct 2018
|
|
SOVEREIGN INDUSTRIES LIMITED
U74900KA2009PLC069837
|
IRP · Aug 2019
IRP · Aug 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 6y 5mo
to Feb 2026
|
|
Wings Travels Management (I) Private Limited
U74999PN2008PTC132907
|
IRP · Dec 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 10 mo
to Sep 2019
|
|
PANDHARI MILK PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999PN2014PTC151510
|
RP · Jan 2020
Liquidator · Mar 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 6mo
to Mar 2022
|
|
Lanna Wellness Private Limited
U85100PN2011PTC140465
|
IRP · Dec 2019
RP · Jan 2020
Liquidator · Oct 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 10 mo
to Oct 2020
|
|
M/S. INFINITY FAB ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
U85110KA1992PTC013449
|
IRP · Jun 2017
RP · Jul 2017
Liquidator · Feb 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 8 mo
to Feb 2018
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: BARMENDRA AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED at 1,443 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BARMENDRA AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U24211MP2006PTC018387
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Oct 2022
|
1,443d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
5Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
Shetty-Patil Developers LLP
AAG4453
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Jan 2020
RP · Feb 2020
|
6y 8mo |
|
WELCOME DISTILLERIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U15520CT1986PTC003334
Food & Agro |
IRP · Mar 2019
|
7y 6mo |
|
R.D.ENGINEERS ( INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
U27200MH1992PTC066672
|
IRP · Oct 2020
|
5y 10mo |
|
ANUSHKA MOULDS AND DIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U29253MH2010PTC201502
Machinery & Equipment |
IRP · Nov 2018
|
7y 10mo |
|
Budhale Engineer Private Limited
U99999MH1984PTC033297
Other Services |
IRP · Dec 2019
RP · Jan 2020
|
6y 9mo |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 5% of 2,567 ranked
At Mumbai bench — by mandate countTop 5% of 445
Recovery vs liquidation value207.5%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor2 of 2
Typical time to outcome18 months
national median 16 months · median of 16 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional36
Liquidator9
Of these, 21 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai19 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,250 concluded cases)
Bengaluru2 mandates
Bench median 12 months to outcome · 27% resolved (176 concluded cases)
Indore1 mandate
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 49% resolved (35 concluded cases)
Laxman runs a median 18 months to outcome across 16 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is moving at the pace of his own forums, within a month either way.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Services7
Other Manufacturing3
Construction & Infrastructure2
Steel & Metals2
Machinery & Equipment2
Food & Agro1
Auto & Components1
Trading & Distribution1
Trying to reach Laxman?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.