Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWADISHT OILS PRIVATE LIMITED
U65921UP1996PTC020083
|
IRP · Jul 2017
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 8mo
to Feb 2019
|
Liquidation — order passed
1Liquidation mandates1on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution01 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHUPEN ELECTRONIC LIMITED
L32105MH1985PLC035516
|
IRP · Feb 2017
RP · Mar 2017
Liquidator · Aug 2017
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 6 mo
to Jul 2017
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count2 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value146.5%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 1
Typical time to outcome13 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional3
Liquidator1
Of these, 2 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai1 mandate
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,251 concluded cases)
Allahabad1 mandate
Bench median 21 months to outcome · 45% resolved (103 concluded cases)
Manish runs a median 13 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 20 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is closing 194 days faster than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Machinery & Equipment1
Financial Services1
Trying to reach Manish?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.