Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MOHAN AROMATICS PRIVATE LIMITED
U24246MH1993PTC074959
→ acquired by Mr. Sumit Khandelwal
|
IRP · Oct 2017
RP · Dec 2017
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Jul 2018
|
Liquidation — order passed
21 of 2 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution11 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value65.5%across 1 case with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution22 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LIMITED
U29119DL1989PLC036554
|
IRP · Oct 2017
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 11 mo
to Aug 2018
|
|
APEX ENGINEERING SOLUTION AND SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
U29219MH2011PTC219804
|
IRP · Jul 2017
RP · Dec 2017
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to Jul 2018
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: MOTHERS PRIDE DAIRY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED at 3,380 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MOTHERS PRIDE DAIRY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999DL2014PTC272213
Other Services |
IRP · Jul 2017
|
3,380d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Expired provisional registration
This record belongs to IBBI's 2016-17 Regulation 9 cohort, whose provisional registrations expired in 2017.
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count4 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value125.9%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 1
Typical time to outcome11 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional6
Of these, 4 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai2 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,244 concluded cases)
New Delhi2 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (776 concluded cases)
Manish runs a median 11 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is closing 184 days faster than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Machinery & Equipment2
Chemicals & Plastics1
Other Services1