Liquidation — order passed
103 of 10 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates10on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution37 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value47.4%across 3 cases with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution26 moaverage over 3 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lata Export Apparels Private Limited
U17200MH1996PTC104231
|
Liquidator · Apr 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
to Apr 2019
|
|
LILY JEWELLERY PRIVATE LIMITED
U36911MH2004PTC144344
|
IRP · Aug 2025
RP · Sep 2025
Liquidator · Apr 2026
|
— | — | — | 8 mo
to Apr 2026
|
|
Sabre Helmets Private Limited
U36993MH2009PTC195096
|
IRP · Mar 2019
RP · Mar 2019
Liquidator · Jan 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 11 mo
to Jan 2020
|
|
Paramount Wheels Private Limited
U50102MH2010PTC210802
|
Liquidator · Jan 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 7mo
to Jan 2022
|
|
Staunch Natural Resources Private Limited
U51432MH2010PTC228076
|
IRP · Jun 2022
Liquidator · Oct 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Oct 2023
|
|
Tork Fastners (India) Private Limited
U51900MH1985PTC035664
|
Liquidator · Nov 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
to Oct 2020
|
|
VRG Digital Corporation Private Limited
U67190MH2008PTC185792
|
RP · Oct 2019
IRP · Oct 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Feb 2021
|
|
ASIS CORPORATE ADVISORS LIMITED
U72100MH2000PLC128709
|
RP · Nov 2025
Liquidator · May 2026
|
— | — | — | 8 mo
to May 2026
|
|
VINDHYAVASINI CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED
U74900MH2010PTC204738
|
Liquidator · Jul 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
to Nov 2022
|
|
Aegis Medicines Private Limited
U99999PN1993PTC073083
|
Liquidator · Aug 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 9mo
to Aug 2024
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
2Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Shubh Aluminium Private Limited at 1,483 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Shubh Aluminium Private Limited
U27203RJ2012PTC039234
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Aug 2022
|
1,483d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
Nirmal Lifestyle Limited
U92411MH1999PLC122542
Hospitality & Leisure |
IRP · Aug 2021
IRP · Aug 2021
IRP · Aug 2021
IRP · Aug 2021
|
257d in extension | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 10% of 2,365 ranked
At Mumbai bench — by mandate countTop 20% of 438
Typical time to outcome15 months
national median 16 months · median of 10 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional13
Liquidator9
Of these, 6 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai11 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Jaipur1 mandate
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 39% resolved (75 concluded cases)
Mukesh runs a median 15 months to outcome across 10 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is closing 88 days faster than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Manufacturing3
Trading & Distribution3
Other Services3
Textiles & Apparel1
Financial Services1
Hospitality & Leisure1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Mukesh?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.