Resolved — plan approved
5Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
L45101DL1967PLC004759
→ acquired by APEX HEIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED
|
IRP · Oct 2023
IRP · Oct 2023
IRP · Oct 2023
IRP · Oct 2023
RP · Dec 2023
RP · Dec 2023
RP · Dec 2023
RP · Dec 2023
IRP · Feb 2025
IRP · Feb 2025
IRP · Feb 2025
IRP · Feb 2025
RP · Apr 2025
RP · Apr 2025
RP · Apr 2025
RP · Apr 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 11mo
to Oct 2025
|
|
SEL Manufacturing Company Limited
L51909PB2000PLC023679
→ acquired by Consortium of ARR ESS Industries Private Limited and Leading Edge Commercial FZE
|
IRP · Apr 2018
RP · Jun 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 10mo
to Feb 2021
|
|
bhushan energy limited
U40105DL2005PLC140748
→ acquired by TATA Steel Limited
|
IRP · Jan 2018
RP · Feb 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to May 2019
|
|
NSL NAGAPATNAM POWER AND INFRATECH LIMITED
U45200TG2005PLC045511
→ acquired by Rungta Mines Limited
|
RP · Oct 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 7y 6mo
to Jul 2025
|
|
Emerald Lands (India) Private Limited
U70109DL2006PTC155922
→ acquired by Malhotra Group PLC
|
IRP · Jan 2020
RP · Feb 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 4mo
to May 2023
|
Liquidation — order passed
62 of 6 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates6on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution24 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value68.0%across 2 cases with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution31 moaverage over 2 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
C and C Construction Limited
L45201DL1996PLC080401
|
IRP · Feb 2019
RP · Jul 2019
Liquidator · Oct 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 7mo
to Oct 2022
|
|
Runeecha textiles limited
L99999DL1986PLC307282
|
IRP · Jul 2018
RP · Aug 2018
Liquidator · Jan 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Jan 2020
|
|
MONNET POWER COMPANY LIMITED
U01403CT2007PLC020179
|
IRP · Mar 2018
RP · Apr 2018
Liquidator · Nov 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 7mo
to Oct 2019
|
|
Navran Advanced Nano Products Developments International Private Limited
U28910DL2008PTC175334
|
IRP · Mar 2018
RP · Apr 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 13 mo
to Apr 2019
|
|
Getit Grocery Private Limited
U51224DL2015PTC279116
|
IRP · Jan 2018
RP · Feb 2018
Liquidator · Jul 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 6 mo
to Jul 2018
|
|
ALPHA PECIFIC ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U74900DL2003PTC123228
|
RP · Jun 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 4y 2mo
to Mar 2026
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
5Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Golden Glow Estates Private Limited at 2,861 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Golden Glow Estates Private Limited
U70101DL2005PTC142098
Real Estate & Housing |
RP · Nov 2019
|
2,861d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
ANDES TOWN PLANNERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U70109DL2006PTC152579
Real Estate & Housing |
RP · Aug 2025
|
1,305d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
Imperia Wishfield Private Limited (Elvedor project)
U45209DL2012PTC233638
Construction & Infrastructure |
RP · Sep 2024
|
835d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
MATRIX GAS AND RENEWABLES LIMITED
U74999GJ2018PLC101075
Power & Energy |
IRP · Feb 2026
RP · Mar 2026
|
228d in extension | Inviting EoI |
|
PARAM RENEWABLE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999GJ2019PTC105888
Power & Energy |
RP · Jul 2026
|
159d within 180d | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 5% of 2,567 ranked
At New Delhi bench — by mandate countTop 5% of 432
Recovery vs liquidation value115.0%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor3 of 4
Typical time to outcome24 months
national median 16 months · median of 11 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional40
Liquidator4
Of these, 10 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi11 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (776 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad2 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (446 concluded cases)
Chandigarh1 mandate
Bench median 20 months to outcome · 36% resolved (211 concluded cases)
Mumbai1 mandate
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,244 concluded cases)
Navneet runs a median 24 months to outcome across 11 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 194 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Construction & Infrastructure4
Power & Energy3
Real Estate & Housing3
Trading & Distribution2
Other Services2
Food & Agro1
Other Manufacturing1
Trying to reach Navneet?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.