Liquidation — order passed
33 of 3 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates3on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution30 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value10.0%across 1 case with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution14 moaverage over 3 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Salasar Enterprises Private Limited
U45100MH2004PTC145669
|
IRP · Oct 2020
RP · Oct 2020
Liquidator · Jul 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 9mo
to Jul 2022
|
|
Elexir Distributors Private Limited
U51109MH1998PTC295901
|
Liquidator · Jan 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 9mo
to Jan 2024
|
|
Pacific Multi-Commodity Ltd.
U74900MH2007PLC175601
|
Liquidator · Jan 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y
to Jan 2023
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Samaypra Technosolution Private Limited at 1,086 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Samaypra Technosolution Private Limited
U52100MH2012PTC231386
Trading & Distribution |
IRP · Oct 2023
|
1,086d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count4 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome22 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional3
Liquidator3
Of these, 2 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai4 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Nishi runs a median 22 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 103 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Trading & Distribution2
Construction & Infrastructure1
Other Services1
Trying to reach Nishi?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.