Resolved — plan approved
3Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sabve Rohini Contractors Private Limited
U45201MH2011PTC223438
→ acquired by Mason Infratech Limited
|
IRP · Mar 2025
IRP · Mar 2025
RP · Apr 2025
RP · Apr 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to Mar 2026
|
|
Laxmiramuna Investments Private Limited
U67120MH1996PTC102139
→ acquired by consortium of Mr. Sandeep Kedia, Ms. Ruchi Kedia and Mr. Ravi Agarwal
|
IRP · Jan 2025
RP · Feb 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 11 mo
to Nov 2025
|
|
GIGEO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
U70101MH1990PTC056929
|
RP · Aug 2024
|
Rs 192 Cr | Rs 25 Cr | 99.3% | 1y 11mo
to May 2026
|
Liquidation — order passed
2Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution02 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAOLIN INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
U45200TG2010PTC068516
|
IRP · Jun 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 9mo
to Mar 2026
|
|
SNNEHA NATURAL WORLD PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999MH2008PTC187325
|
Liquidator · Mar 2026
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 8mo
to Jul 2021
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
5Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Navyug Telefilms Pvt. Ltd at 679 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Navyug Telefilms Pvt. Ltd
U92110MH1994PTC078309
Hospitality & Leisure |
IRP · Nov 2024
RP · Dec 2024
|
679d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
Cubatics Prrocessors India Private Limited
U17120GJ2008PTC052714
Textiles & Apparel |
RP · May 2025
|
547d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
Cubatics Industries Private Limited
U17291MH2014PTC254110
Textiles & Apparel |
IRP · Jun 2025
IRP · Jun 2025
|
476d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
BANSI PULP AND PAPER MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED
U21099PN1996PTC096746
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Jun 2026
|
100d within 180d | Inviting EoI |
|
UTKAL STEELS LIMITED.
U27109OR1970PLC000546
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Jun 2026
|
98d within 180d | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 20% of 2,305 ranked
Recovery vs liquidation value99.5%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 2
Typical time to outcome21 months
national median 16 months · median of 5 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional15
Liquidator1
Of these, 7 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai7 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad2 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (446 concluded cases)
Hyderabad1 mandate
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 38% resolved (348 concluded cases)
Pankaj runs a median 21 months to outcome across 5 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 101 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Textiles & Apparel2
Other Manufacturing2
Construction & Infrastructure2
Financial Services1
Real Estate & Housing1
Other Services1
Hospitality & Leisure1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Pankaj?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.