Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DHANURDHAR PROCESSORS PRIVATE LIMITED
U17219GJ2006PTC049463
→ acquired by Mr. Virendra Agarwal and others
|
IRP · Jun 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 2mo
to Aug 2022
|
Liquidation — order passed
1Liquidation mandates1on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution01 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TREND FLOORING PRIVATE LIMITED
U17226DL2005PTC143849
|
IRP · Oct 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 11 mo
to Sep 2020
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count2 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value85.1%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor0 of 1
Typical time to outcome19 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional2
Of these, 2 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Ahmedabad1 mandate
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (447 concluded cases)
New Delhi1 mandate
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Rajeev runs a median 19 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 16 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 77 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Textiles & Apparel2
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Rajeev?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.