Resolved — plan approved
8Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Baldva Textiles Private Limited
U17124RJ1985PTC003437
→ acquired by BMD International Pvt. Ltd
|
RP · Jan 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to Nov 2022
|
|
Super Shiv Shakti Chemicals Private Limited
U24119RJ2004PTC019955
→ acquired by Shubh Labh Contractor Pvt. Ltd.
|
RP · Apr 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 3mo
to Apr 2022
|
|
SAURASHTRA SPECIALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U24133GJ2001PTC039805
→ acquired by Besto Tradelink Limited
|
RP · Jan 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
to Feb 2024
|
|
AGARWAL MITTAL CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED
U27109GJ2008PTC053776
→ acquired by Mangalam Worldwide Private Limited
|
RP · Aug 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 8mo
to Dec 2021
|
|
Dharma Extrusions Private Limited
U28113GJ2009PTC057555
→ acquired by Sonal Yogeshbhai Shah (Individual)
|
RP · Jul 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 9mo
to Mar 2025
|
|
SANCHETI BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U50103RJ1994PTC009165
→ acquired by Mr. Pawan Kumar Gour, Rekha Devi Gour and Pawan Kumar HUF (Consortium)
|
IRP · Jul 2024
RP · Aug 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Dec 2025
|
|
flywheel logistics solutions private limited
U60232DL2015PTC288609
→ acquired by Shyam Sundar Agarwal
|
RP · Jan 2021
RP · Jan 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 2mo
to Nov 2021
|
|
HYPER TECHNO BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED
U70101RJ2009PTC030504
→ acquired by M/s Siddhartha Tex Fab Proprietorship firm of Mr. Siddhartha Gattani (SRA)
|
IRP · Dec 2021
IRP · Dec 2021
RP · Feb 2022
RP · Feb 2022
IRP · Aug 2022
IRP · Aug 2022
RP · Sep 2022
RP · Sep 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
to Mar 2023
|
Liquidation — order passed
31 of 3 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates3on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution12 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value45.9%across 1 case with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution20 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vadera Tradelink Private Limited
U52190RJ2008PTC026035
|
IRP · Jan 2024
RP · Feb 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 11mo
to Jan 2026
|
|
FLPL LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED
U60200DL2009PTC192531
|
RP · Dec 2020
Liquidator · Mar 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 14 mo
to Mar 2021
|
|
S S INVESTMENTS PVT LTD
U70109AP1984PTC005156
|
IRP · Jun 2022
RP · Jul 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | — |
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
5Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: DMC Infrastructure Private Limited at 1,986 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
DMC Infrastructure Private Limited
U45400DL2008PTC178327
Construction & Infrastructure |
RP · Apr 2024
|
1,986d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
Hotel Netra Palace Private Limited
U55101GJ2003PTC042092
Hospitality & Leisure |
RP · May 2024
IRP · May 2024
|
866d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
New Tech Imports Private Limited
U74899DL1995PTC067511
Other Services |
IRP · Apr 2025
|
523d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
Alankrit Road Developers Private Limited
U45309RJ2017PTC058270
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Apr 2025
RP · May 2025
|
515d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
PRAYAG POLYTECH PRIVATE LIMITED (TRANSFER FROM DELHI TO RAJASTHAN)
U28994RJ1982PTC012328
Steel & Metals |
IRP · Feb 2026
RP · May 2026
|
224d in extension | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
2Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
ADIG Jemtex Private Limited
U17119RJ2010PTC033650
Textiles & Apparel |
IRP · Jun 2021
RP · Jul 2021
|
5y 3mo |
|
Aarti Suitings Private Limited
U18108RJ1994PTC007997
Textiles & Apparel |
IRP · Jun 2021
RP · Jul 2021
|
5y 3mo |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 5% of 2,365 ranked
At Jaipur bench — by mandate countTop 5% of 46
Recovery vs liquidation value130.0%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor6 of 8
Typical time to outcome19 months
national median 16 months · median of 10 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional34
Liquidator1
Of these, 10 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Jaipur9 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 39% resolved (75 concluded cases)
New Delhi4 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad3 mandates
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (446 concluded cases)
Mumbai2 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Rishabh runs a median 19 months to outcome across 10 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 67 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Textiles & Apparel3
Steel & Metals3
Construction & Infrastructure2
Trading & Distribution2
Logistics & Transport2
Real Estate & Housing2
Chemicals & Plastics1
Other Manufacturing1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Rishabh?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.