Resolved — plan approved
3Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUPRIYA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
U01100RJ1985PLC003363
→ acquired by R Net Intelligent Systems Private Limited
|
IRP · Mar 2023
RP · Jun 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 9 mo
to Dec 2023
|
|
ZENITH MINING PRIVATE LIMITED
U14108OR1996PTC004466
→ acquired by Advantech Technology Private Limited
|
IRP · Nov 2024
RP · Mar 2025
|
Rs 158 Cr | Rs 158 Cr | 89.7% | 18 mo
to Apr 2026
|
|
GRJ DISTRIBUTORS & DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U51396DL1998PTC097177
→ acquired by Mr. Vivek Gupta
|
IRP · Mar 2023
IRP · Mar 2023
IRP · Mar 2023
IRP · Mar 2023
RP · May 2023
RP · May 2023
RP · May 2023
RP · May 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 7mo
to Oct 2024
|
Under CIRP — live
5Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: VIDEOCON INFINITY INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED at 1,840 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VIDEOCON INFINITY INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
U45400WB2008PTC126333
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Sep 2021
|
1,840d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
MAHAMAY BUILDING SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED
U70100DL2011PTC229258
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Aug 2022
RP · Dec 2023
|
1,497d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
PCK CORPORATION LLP
AAJ4834
Trading & Distribution |
RP · Jun 2026
|
1,200d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
SYNERGY PETRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
U74999DL2001PTC112462
Chemicals & Plastics |
IRP · Dec 2024
RP · Jan 2025
|
664d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
VARDHMAN INFRADEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U45200DL2010PTC207136
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Jan 2025
RP · Mar 2025
|
606d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count8 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value201.0%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor2 of 3
Typical time to outcome18 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional20
Of these, 7 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi4 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (776 concluded cases)
Mumbai1 mandate
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,244 concluded cases)
Jaipur1 mandate
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 38% resolved (74 concluded cases)
Cuttack1 mandate
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 35% resolved (49 concluded cases)
Sanjeet runs a median 18 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is moving at the pace of his own forums, within a month either way.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Trading & Distribution2
Construction & Infrastructure2
Food & Agro1
Mining1
Real Estate & Housing1
Chemicals & Plastics1
Trying to reach Sanjeet?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.