Resolved — plan approved
2Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PRIMUSS PIPES & TUBES LIMITED
L22219UP1975PLC004105
→ acquired by M/s Pioneer Engineering Industries
|
IRP · Jun 2022
RP · Jul 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 11mo
to Jun 2024
|
|
Haryana Telecom Limited
U32109CH1987PLC031464
→ acquired by Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Mehlawat
|
IRP · Feb 2020
RP · Mar 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 2mo
to Apr 2023
|
Liquidation — order passed
1Liquidation mandates1on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution01 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RBT PRIVATE LIMITED
U17299HR2016PTC064269
|
Liquidator · May 2024
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 10mo
to May 2024
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
3Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: EHL HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED at 1,692 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EHL HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED
U74140HR2014PTC053412
Other Services |
IRP · Feb 2022
|
1,692d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
NITYA REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U70109DL2009PTC194433
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Aug 2022
RP · Sep 2022
|
1,509d past 330d limit | Inviting EoI |
|
ILD Housing Projects Private Limited
U70109DL2006PTC151365
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Feb 2024
IRP · Feb 2024
|
936d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Withdrawn / settled
6Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
PROVIEW INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
U45200DL2008PTC180512
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Aug 2022
IRP · Aug 2022
RP · Sep 2022
RP · Sep 2022
|
4y 1mo |
|
SALUJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED
U45201DL1987PLC028644
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Aug 2019
IRP · Aug 2019
IRP · Dec 2023
IRP · Dec 2023
|
7y |
|
Rudra Buildwell Projects Private Limited
U45400DL2010PTC209159
Construction & Infrastructure |
IRP · Jun 2023
|
3y 3mo |
|
NEWCON ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U70102DL2012PTC239965
Real Estate & Housing |
IRP · Sep 2022
IRP · Sep 2022
RP · Oct 2022
RP · Oct 2022
|
8y |
|
IMPERIAL FASTNERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U74899DL1982PTC013567
Other Services |
IRP · Jul 2020
|
6y 1mo |
|
SUMANGLAM IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED
U74899DL1988PTC031180
Other Services |
IRP · Apr 2019
|
7y 5mo |
Voluntary liquidations
2Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Median time to dissolution2y 4mo
across 2 completed · every VL on record runs 1y 8mo
Dissolution orders read2 of 2
the tribunal's own order, field by field — expand a row for the dated sequence
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WUXI YUSHOU MEDICARE PRIVATE LIMITED U33110PB2012PTC036984
7 dated steps in the orderCHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Jan 2022 |
Rs 1 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 1 Cr | 2y 2mo to Mar 2024 |
| TREND COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED U52334HR1999PTC048468
6 dated steps in the orderChandigarh Bench, Chandigarh
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Dec 2020 |
Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | Rs 0 Cr | 2y 7mo to Aug 2023 |
Figures shown where an outcome has been filed. The dated sequence inside a row is read from the tribunal's dissolution order itself, one field at a time, with the page it came from held against it. Regulation 37 (as amended with effect from 31 January 2024) sets 270 days from commencement where the creditors approved the resolution and 90 days where they were not required to — this page does not assign a per-case target, because whether creditors approved is recorded in these orders as prose and has not been classified. The comparison shown is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record: same statistic, same basis.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count6 mandates on record
At Chandigarh bench — by mandate countTop 20% of 120
Recovery vs liquidation value104.1%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 2
Typical time to outcome35 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional24
Liquidator1
Voluntary Liquidator2
Of these, 11 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi8 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Chandigarh3 mandates
Bench median 20 months to outcome · 37% resolved (210 concluded cases)
Allahabad1 mandate
Bench median 21 months to outcome · 45% resolved (103 concluded cases)
Sanyam runs a median 35 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 503 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Construction & Infrastructure3
Real Estate & Housing3
Other Services3
Other Manufacturing1
Textiles & Apparel1
Electronics & Electricals1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Sanyam?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.