Liquidation — order passed
41 of 4 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates4on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution13 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value87.6%across 1 case with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution45 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Falcon Tyres Limited
L25114KA1973PLC002455
|
RP · Jul 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 8mo
to Dec 2019
|
|
Lanco Infratech Limited
L45200TG1993PLC015545
|
IRP · Aug 2017
RP · Sep 2017
Liquidator · Aug 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 13 mo
to Aug 2018
|
|
Siva Industries and Holdings Limited
U01134TN1994PLC026861
|
IRP · Jul 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 1mo
to Aug 2021
|
|
Shirpur Power Private Limited
U40100GJ2005PTC094304
|
IRP · Mar 2020
RP · Jun 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
to Mar 2021
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count4 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome19 months
national median 16 months · median of 4 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional6
Liquidator1
Of these, 3 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Bengaluru1 mandate
Bench median 12 months to outcome · 27% resolved (177 concluded cases)
Hyderabad1 mandate
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 38% resolved (348 concluded cases)
Chennai1 mandate
Bench median 13 months to outcome · 20% resolved (503 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad1 mandate
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (447 concluded cases)
Savan runs a median 19 months to outcome across 4 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 14 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 158 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Manufacturing1
Construction & Infrastructure1
Food & Agro1
Power & Energy1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Savan?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.