Liquidation — order passed
31 of 3 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates3on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution12 still in process
Order to dissolution24 moaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.E.T.POWER LIMITED
U33111TN1987PLC014842
|
IRP · Aug 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 6y
to Mar 2024
|
|
INSPAN INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U72900TN2001PTC048011
|
IRP · Mar 2021
RP · Apr 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 8 mo
to Nov 2021
|
|
TECPRO INFRA-PROJECTS LIMITED
U74210DL1981PLC234183
|
IRP · Oct 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 1mo
to Nov 2021
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Trusted Aerospace Engineering Private Limited at 2,652 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Trusted Aerospace Engineering Private Limited
U35303TN2006PTC058729
Machinery & Equipment |
IRP · Jun 2019
|
2,652d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count4 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome26 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional5
Of these, 4 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Chennai3 mandates
Bench median 13 months to outcome · 20% resolved (503 concluded cases)
New Delhi1 mandate
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Senthilkumar runs a median 26 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 14 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 360 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Machinery & Equipment2
Other Services2
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Senthilkumar?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.