Liquidation — order passed
22 of 2 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution20 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value198.2%across 1 case with both figures · whole record 79.7%
Order to dissolution20 moaverage over 2 completed cases
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BEVCON WAYORS PRIVATE LIMITED
U29210TG1994PTC018656
|
IRP · May 2022
IRP · May 2022
RP · Jun 2022
RP · Jun 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 7mo
to May 2023
|
|
TAKSHEEL SOLUTIONS LIMITED
U72200TG1999PLC032556
|
RP · Jul 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 7 mo
to Oct 2019
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Withdrawn / settled
2Settled between debtor and creditors before an outcome — counted separately.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Time in Process |
|---|---|---|
|
GANGIDI INDUSTRIES LIMITED
U36990TG2017PLC116950
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Dec 2019
|
6y 9mo |
|
UPTEC IDEALABS LIMITED
U80901TG2013PLC089333
Other Services |
IRP · Jun 2019
|
7y 3mo |
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count2 mandates on record
Typical time to outcome25 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional7
Of these, 3 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Hyderabad4 mandates
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 38% resolved (346 concluded cases)
Sistla runs a median 25 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 14 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 322 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Machinery & Equipment1
Other Manufacturing1
IT, Telecom & Media1
Other Services1
Trying to reach Sistla?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.