Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maharashtra Vidhyut Nigam Private Limited
U40100MH2005PTC156213
→ acquired by Shanti G. D. Ispat and Power Private Limited
|
RP · Mar 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 17 mo
to Jul 2020
|
Liquidation — order passed
1Liquidation mandates1on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution01 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yash Jewellery Private Limited
U27205MH2006PTC165520
|
IRP · Aug 2023
RP · Sep 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 11 mo
to Jun 2024
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: Dilshad Trading Co Private Limited at 1,181 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dilshad Trading Co Private Limited
U51900MH1982PTC027434
Trading & Distribution |
IRP · Jul 2023
|
1,181d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count3 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value100.5%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 1
Typical time to outcome14 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional4
Of these, 2 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai3 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,244 concluded cases)
Surya runs a median 14 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is closing 123 days faster than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Manufacturing1
Power & Energy1
Trading & Distribution1
Trying to reach Surya?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.