Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIBRI TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U85110UP1992PTC013957
→ acquired by M/s Kinetic Trust Limited
|
RP · Aug 2025
|
Rs 2 Cr | Rs 1 Cr | 262.9% | 12 mo
to May 2026
|
Liquidation — order passed
21 of 2 carried through to dissolution — liquidation completed and the company struck off.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution11 still in process
Order to dissolution116 daysaverage over 1 completed case
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
samtex desinz private limited
U18209DL2017PTC320315
|
IRP · Sep 2021
RP · Oct 2021
Liquidator · Apr 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 6mo
to Mar 2024
|
|
Ansh Energy Solutions Private Limited
U93000UP2009PTC038660
|
IRP · Jan 2021
RP · Feb 2021
Liquidator · Dec 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 10mo
to Dec 2023
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
Under CIRP — live
7Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: A.ES ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED at 448 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A.ES ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED
U24233DL2007PTC161365
Other Manufacturing |
IRP · Jul 2025
IRP · Jul 2025
|
448d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
|
HANUNG FURNISHINGS PRIVATE LIMITED
U17211DL2002PTC115344
Textiles & Apparel |
IRP · Nov 2025
|
307d inside 330d | Newly admitted |
|
ABHINAV INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED
U51909DL2002PTC114147
Trading & Distribution |
IRP · Nov 2025
|
307d inside 330d | Newly admitted |
|
C K SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED
U72501DL2000PTC106184
Other Services |
IRP · Nov 2025
|
307d inside 330d | Newly admitted |
|
HANUNG PROCESSORS PRIVATE LIMITED
U18201DL2002PTC116882
Textiles & Apparel |
IRP · Dec 2025
|
279d inside 330d | Newly admitted |
|
PRANEET SOFTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
U72900DL2002PTC115139
Other Services |
IRP · Dec 2025
|
279d inside 330d | Newly admitted |
|
SANKALPA OVERSEAS PRIVATE LTD.
U74899DL1988PTC034254
Other Services |
IRP · Dec 2025
|
279d inside 330d | Newly admitted |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 20% of 2,305 ranked
At Allahabad bench — by mandate countTop 5% of 50
Recovery vs liquidation value262.9%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor1 of 1
Typical time to outcome30 months
national median 16 months · median of 3 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional13
Liquidator2
Of these, 9 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi8 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Allahabad2 mandates
Bench median 21 months to outcome · 45% resolved (103 concluded cases)
Vimal runs a median 30 months to outcome across 3 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 371 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Other Services4
Textiles & Apparel3
Other Manufacturing1
Trading & Distribution1
Healthcare1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Vimal?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.