Resolved — plan approved
1Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DUXTON HILLS BUILDER PRIVATE LIMITED
U65100DL2005PTC142867
→ acquired by Miker Financial Consultants Private Limited
|
IRP · Aug 2023
RP · Sep 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 10 mo
to May 2024
|
Liquidation — order passed
1Liquidation mandates1on this professional's record
Taken to dissolution01 still in process
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GARVIT INNOVATIVE PROMOTERS LIMITED
U70102UP2010PLC041399
|
Liquidator · May 2026
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 2y 7mo
to Oct 2025
|
Duration = CIRP commencement to liquidation order. Figures shown for orders in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate count2 mandates on record
Recovery vs liquidation value73.7%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor0 of 1
Typical time to outcome21 months
national median 16 months · median of 2 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional2
Liquidator1
Of these, 1 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
New Delhi1 mandate
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (780 concluded cases)
Allahabad1 mandate
Bench median 21 months to outcome · 45% resolved (103 concluded cases)
Vineet runs a median 21 months to outcome across 2 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 19 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 50 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Financial Services1
Real Estate & Housing1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Vineet?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.