Nefa Road Carrier Private Limited
The wind-down at a glance. Follow the recorded outcome, financials and people behind this company.
What did the wind-down return?
Reported financials Rs crore, shown in lakh below Rs 1 crore
Where the money went
Reported amountsCreditor dues are not reported, so the payout cannot be assessed against them.
All financial figures & reading notes
| Realisation of assets | Rs 5.41 Cr |
|---|---|
| Amount due to creditors | Not reported |
| Amount paid to creditors | Not reported |
| Liquidation expenses | Rs 3.00 L |
| Surplus to members | Rs 5.38 Cr |
"Not reported" means no figure is available. A reported zero is shown as zero. Registry capital further down the page is separate from liquidation proceeds, and so are any figures read from the NCLT order.
Where this wind-down sits
against every completed s.59 on the register376 days faster than the median of 618 days across 1,597 completed wind-downs
the median is 9.5%
72% of completed wind-downs returned a surplus to members
above the median realisation of Rs 66.00 L
This is a voluntary liquidation under IBC Section 59 — a solvent company choosing to wind up. Creditors are paid in full and costs met before any surplus returns to members; there is no haircut and no acquirer. Read assets realised, creditor payments, expenses and members' surplus separately. Here, Rs 5.38 Cr in surplus was returned to members.
The NCLT order
Read from the document itself
- Bench
- Guwahati Bench
- Case number
- CP (IB) No. 3/GB/2022
- Order date
- 16 Sep 2022
Dissolved effective order date 16.09.2022
What the bench said
The tribunal found that the company has no creditors, the liquidator duly complied with the liquidation process, the pending criminal compounding case was withdrawn by ROC, proper books of accounts were maintained, and there are no foreseeable material losses or public interest concerns, making it a fit case for dissolution under Section 59(8).
Statutory observations
ROC observed that certain minutes of board/general meetings and statutory registers were not properly maintained or submitted during initial scrutiny, and a compounding case under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 was pending, which was later withdrawn by ROC.
Why the company wound up
In the order's own words
Non-availability of business prospects and long-term financial resources, the company has no intention to carry on any business in the future
- What it was set up to do
- To carry on the business of Transport operators, carriage agents, and to undertake carriage contracts from Govt. and other private parties and to acquire, maintain, take on hire or acquire on hire purchase basis or on installment system or otherwise all types of Vehicles including truck, buses, trailers etc. for transportation business and to let, sub -let or otherwise carry-on business of goods and passengers.
- What it was doing by the end
- There have been no significant business operations in the Company for last few years
The wind-down, stage by stage
12 dated stages
- 8 Jan 2022 Board resolution to wind up
- 8 Jan 2022 Declaration of solvency
- 17 Jan 2022 Liquidation commenced
- 19 Jan 2022 Public announcement
- 16 Feb 2022 Last date for creditors to claim
- 17 Feb 2022 Preliminary report
- 7 Mar 2022 Final report filed with the ROC
- 8 Mar 2022 Final report
- 8 Mar 2022 Final report filed with IBBI
- 1 Sep 2022 Last hearing
- 16 Sep 2022 NCLT order
- 16 Sep 2022 Dissolved
Green marks a date from the IBBI register; blue marks a date read from an NCLT order.
The company behind the record
Identity, registration and capital
- MCA status
- Dissolved (Liquidated)
- Company class
- Private
- Category
- Company limited by shares
- Sub-category
- Non-government company
- Listing
- Unlisted
- State
- Assam
- ROC
- ROC Guwahati
- Industry
- Transport, storage and Communications
- PIN
- 781009
- Incorporated
- 8 Nov 2011
- Authorised capital
- Rs 10.25 Cr
- Paid-up capital
- Rs 10.01 Cr
- CIN
- U60230AS2011PTC010764
- Registered office
- SHIVAM COMPLEX BHARALUMUKH, A.T ROAD,GUWAHATI,Kamrup,Assam,781009-India
Directors named in the order
Purnanand Pareek · Ghan Shyam Sharma
The money, as the order printed it
Rs as stated in the document — not the crore figures above
What the company held
Unquoted shares of a company namely, TNE AAC PRIVATE LIMITED held by the Corporate Person/Applicant as investment
Creditors and claims
As the order records them
Received claims forms from 2 of the equity stakeholders
Creditor approval
There were no creditors in the company, hence the requirement of the Special Resolution being approved by creditors having 2/3rd value of shares does not arise.
Litigation and delays
The frictions the order records
Litigation
Case no. 445(s) of 2017 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shillong filed by ROC against company and its directors for violation of Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013, which was subsequently withdrawn by the ROC.
Figures come from IBBI, NCLT, MCA and other official sources. Methodology · Report an error
See other companies in the voluntary liquidation register.