Resolved — plan approved
6Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last two quarters — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realised | Rec vs LV | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ballarpur Industries Limited
L21010MH1945PLC010337
→ acquired by Finquest Financial Solutions Private Limited
|
RP · May 2020
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 2mo
to Mar 2023
|
|
McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited
L45202WB1961PLC025181
→ acquired by BTL EPC Limited
|
IRP · Apr 2022
IRP · Apr 2022
RP · Apr 2022
RP · Apr 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 1y 7mo
to Dec 2023
|
|
Jaypee Infratech Limited
L45203UP2007PLC033119
→ acquired by Suraksha Realty Limited along with M/s. Lakshdeep Investments and Finance Private Limited
|
IRP · Aug 2018
RP · Aug 2018
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 5y 6mo
to Mar 2023
|
|
VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED
L99999MH1986PLC103624
→ acquired by Twin Star Technologies Limited
|
RP · Jul 2018
IRP · Jun 2019
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y
to Jun 2021
|
|
C & C Towers Limited
U45206HR2009PLC038928
→ acquired by Mahakram Developers Private Limited
|
RP · Sep 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 4y
to Oct 2023
|
|
INDO GLOBAL SOFT SOLUTIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
U72900PN2005PTC021732
→ acquired by Ashdan Properties Private Limited
|
RP · May 2025
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 7mo
to Nov 2025
|
Under CIRP — live
1Where each live mandate stands against the statutory clock — 180 days from commencement, 270 with the single permitted extension, 330 as the outer limit.
Longest-running live mandate: VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED at 3,027 days from commencement.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Statutory clock | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
U72900MH2007PLC204763
Other Services |
RP · Jul 2018
IRP · Jun 2019
|
3,027d past 330d limit | Under CIRP |
Admitted claims and recovery are determined only as each case concludes, so figures appear here once an outcome is reached. The day count runs from the insolvency commencement date (s.12 IBC). A case past 330 days is not a default by the professional: the Supreme Court struck the word “mandatorily” from that proviso in CoC of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta (2019), and time lost to the tribunal's own listing is counted in the figure. Read it as runway, not as a verdict.
Voluntary liquidations
1Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Typical time to dissolution1y 8mo
median across every VL on record — none of these mandates has reached dissolution yet
Dissolution orders read1 of 1
the tribunal's own order, field by field — expand a row for the dated sequence
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eicher Polaris Private Limited U34300DL2012PTC243453
3 dated steps in the orderNEW DELHI BENCH, COURT -V
|
Voluntary Liquidator · Feb 2024 |
— | — | — | in process |
Figures shown where an outcome has been filed. The dated sequence inside a row is read from the tribunal's dissolution order itself, one field at a time, with the page it came from held against it. Regulation 37 (as amended with effect from 31 January 2024) sets 270 days from commencement where the creditors approved the resolution and 90 days where they were not required to — this page does not assign a per-case target, because whether creditors approved is recorded in these orders as prose and has not been classified. The comparison shown is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record: same statistic, same basis.
About this data: Figures come from the IBBI professional register, IBBI published data and public announcement records. Comparisons are medians across stressed.in's full IBBI universe. How every number is sourced, checked and corrected →.
Report an error →
Activity & context · vs India's IP universe
Activity — mandate countTop 20% of 2,308 ranked
Recovery vs liquidation value115.2%
IBBI cumulative across all CIRPs since 2016: 166.6% · same basis, realised ÷ liquidation value
Mandates that beat the liquidation floor4 of 5
Typical time to outcome41 months
national median 16 months · median of 6 concluded mandates
Computed across stressed.in's IBBI universe — 8,500+ CIRPs · 5,400+ registered professionals; updates as records load. Ranks count mandates only and are not a quality score — recovery and duration depend on each company's condition and case mix as much as the professional.
Role mix
Resolution Professional13
Voluntary Liquidator1
Of these, 4 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — his mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai4 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,249 concluded cases)
Kolkata1 mandate
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 33% resolved (530 concluded cases)
Allahabad1 mandate
Bench median 21 months to outcome · 45% resolved (103 concluded cases)
Chandigarh1 mandate
Bench median 20 months to outcome · 37% resolved (210 concluded cases)
Anuj runs a median 41 months to outcome across 6 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of his cases each one holds —
so he is taking 685 days longer than the forums he files in.
Bench medians run across every concluded CIRP on record at that bench, not only this professional's. Duration turns on the company's condition and the tribunal's listing as much as on the professional — context, not a ranking.
Sector exposure
Construction & Infrastructure3
Other Services2
Other Manufacturing1
IT, Telecom & Media1
Is this your profile?
This page already exists — buyers already see it. Claiming puts you in control: your photo, your story, your numbers in context, enquiries routed to you.
Claim profile →Trying to reach Anuj?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.