Every company admitted to CIRP and later withdrawn — settled with its creditors under Section 12A, set aside on appeal by the NCLAT, or recalled by the NCLT. See them.
The settlements desk six rows here · the full register for members
Find the comparable exit
Narrow by how long it took, whether the estate was put to market, the route as recorded, sector, bench, year or registry status; the benchmark line recomputes for the selection and every row opens to the order, the petition and what came after.
Benchmark for this selection · n 38
median 46 d to withdrawal (43 d faster than the national median in the tiles above) · 58% inside 90 days (national 51%) · 21% put to market first (national 17%) · 79% MCA-active today (national 81%) — whole record, this selection.
Showing 6 of 38 withdrawals, newest firstTime in process = admission → withdrawal · route quoted, not translated
MembersThe comparables behind every exit — how fast settlements come, who settles and with whom, what happened after, and the settlement clock by year, sector, bench and claim size.See plans →Sign in
The freshest exits from NCLT orders to 25 Sep 2026
Withdrawn since 30 Jun 2026 — 8 companies
The settlements the NCLT allowed after IBBI's cut-off, weeks before they reach a published table: the order date and the bench.
Members2 more withdrawals since 30 Jun 2026, each with who filed, whether the estate went to market and the professional — on Pipeline and the Full Investor Desk.See plans →Sign in
Every terminal state has a re-entry path three independent signals, named on each row
Back in the process — 58 settlements that did not hold
A withdrawal is not a verdict, and it is not always the end. These companies were admitted to a fresh insolvency after the tribunal allowed their petition to be withdrawn — the smallest and least published dataset on this page, and the one a creditor weighing a settlement should read first.
Members52 more companies back in the process after a withdrawal, each with the signal that shows it — on Pipeline and the Full Investor Desk.See plans →Sign in
Our count, their count, the difference stated
How the withdrawals on this record reconcile to IBBI's published cumulative, and why the two populations are not the same shape.
1,333IBBI's Section 12A withdrawals as at 30 Jun 2026
1,495Ours, like-for-like to the same cut-off
+162Difference, documented case by case
15%of IBBI's 9,166 admissions ended in a 12A withdrawal — about one in seven
How the two counts reconcile
Our count is in the tiles above; the 8 withdrawals dated after IBBI's cut-off (the register above) come out of it to give the like-for-like figure. The two populations are not the same shape: IBBI counts Section 12A withdrawals, while this record counts every admission that ended in a withdrawal or closure order, whatever the order calls it.
Route as recorded, over the whole record: 469 say Section 12A on the case row or the order · 802 say withdrawn with no section named · 150 are closed per IBBI's remark (12A / appeal / review / settlement — a category, not a finding) or say closure · the cases set aside, recalled or settled on appeal are counted at the top of the page · 1 carry no remark. “Section 12A” is printed only where the source says so.
The latest withdrawal on this record is dated 7 Sep 2026 while the order feed runs to 25 Sep 2026 — withdrawal orders after that date are in the feed and not yet graded, so the count is a floor.
As of IBBI withdrawal figures to 30 Jun 2026 · NCLT/NCLAT orders to 25 Sep 2026 · latest withdrawal on this record 7 Sep 2026 · MCA status as on 12 Jun 2026, which runs on its own clock.