16 advocates whose name begins with “O”, listed alphabetically. Every name opens a free profile. There is no ranking on this page and no performance figure — there is no advocate register to measure anyone against.
| Advocate | Companies | Orders | Benches the cases sit at |
|---|---|---|---|
| O.P. Singh | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| OLV Ganesan | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| Om Pal Sharma | 1 | 1 | Chandigarh |
| Om Prakash Sr. Adv. | 2 | 2 | Chennai |
| Om Prakash Rai | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| Omkar Deosthale | 4 | 4 | Mumbai |
| Omkar Kelkar | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| Omkar V. Deosthale | 2 | 2 | Mumbai |
| Omprakash Parihar | 2 | 2 | Mumbai |
| Omshri Devprocon Limited | 1 | 1 | Ahmedabad |
| Ooshma Jain | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| Op. Bank Ltd | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| operational | 1 | 1 | Chandigarh |
| Order reserved on | 1 | 1 | Cuttack |
| other | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| Ovia Nila | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
Companies = distinct corporate debtors the advocate is named against. Orders = distinct tribunal orders their name was read from. Bench is the bench of the CASE, not of the hearing. How each case ended is on the advocate’s own page, free, and across the whole list in the directory.
Where this comes from. Advocate names are read from the appearance block printed at the head of tribunal orders, across admission orders (3,524) · liquidation orders (2,278) · resolution orders (1,176) · plan-approval orders (528) · scanned resolution orders (245). No name is inferred and none is matched to a register, because none exists. Methodology · Report an error.