696 advocates whose name begins with “S”, listed alphabetically. Every name opens a free profile. There is no ranking on this page and no performance figure — there is no advocate register to measure anyone against.
| Advocate | Companies | Orders | Benches the cases sit at |
|---|---|---|---|
| S A Associates | 1 | 1 | Bengaluru |
| S.A. Juber Hussain | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| S.Aravindah | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S. Bahadur | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| S. Bahadur Singh | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| S. Chakraborty | 1 | 1 | |
| S. Datta | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| S Easwaran | 1 | 1 | Kochi |
| S. Ghosh | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| S. J. Mishra | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| S. Jain | 1 | 1 | Guwahati |
| S.K. Agarwal | 1 | 1 | Ahmedabad |
| S. K Gandhi | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| S.K. Jain | 4 | 4 | Mumbai |
| S.K.Nayak | 1 | 2 | Kolkata |
| S.K. Ray | 2 | 2 | Kolkata |
| S.K. Sharma | 5 | 6 | New Delhi |
| S. K. Singhi | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| S.K.Srinivasan | 1 | 1 | Bengaluru |
| S.K. Tiwari | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| S. Kackar | 1 | 1 | |
| S. Kasturi Rangan | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| S. Keshava Rao | 3 | 3 | Hyderabad |
| S. M. Algaus | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| S.M. Gupta | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| S. Mahaiani | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| S. Mukherjee | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| S.Murali | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S. N. Mookherjee | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| S. N. Mookherji Sr. Adv. | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| S Narendra Kumar | 2 | 2 | Bengaluru |
| S. Niranjan Reddy Sr. Adv. | 2 | 2 | Amaravati, Hyderabad |
| S.P. Singh Chawla | 2 | 2 | Chandigarh, New Delhi |
| S R Kamlacharan | 1 | 1 | Bengaluru |
| S.R. Raghunathan | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S.R. Rajagopal Sr. Adv. | 2 | 2 | Hyderabad |
| S.R. Rajagopalan Sr. Adv. | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S.R.Tejas | 1 | 1 | Bengaluru |
| S. Raghunath | 2 | 2 | Mumbai |
| S.Rajagopal | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S. Rajesh | 1 | 1 | Bengaluru |
| S. Rama | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| S. Ravi Sr. Adv. | 9 | 9 | Hyderabad, Chennai |
| S.S. Brar | 2 | 2 | Chandigarh |
| S. S. Jan | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| S. S. Ray | 1 | 1 | |
| S. Sathiyanarayan | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S.Sathiyanarayana | 2 | 4 | Chennai |
| S. Sathiyanarayanan | 5 | 5 | Chennai |
| S. Sathyanarayanan | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S. Satish | 1 | 1 | |
| S. Selvathirumurugan | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S. Shetty | 1 | 2 | Mumbai |
| S. Shishir | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| S. Shivaswamy | 1 | 1 | Bengaluru |
| S. Sourav | 1 | 1 | Cuttack |
| S. Suriyanarayana | 1 | 1 | Ahmedabad |
| S. Umamaheswari | 1 | 1 | Chennai |
| S.V. Satyanarayana | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| S. Vedhavel | 1 | 1 | |
| S. Vivek Reddy | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| S. Vivekananda | 3 | 3 | Bengaluru, Hyderabad |
| Saahil Menon | 1 | 1 | |
| Saakshi Saboo | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| Sabhya Jain | 3 | 3 | New Delhi |
| Sabyasachi Chatterjee | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Sabyasachi Chaudhury | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| Sachin | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Sachin Mintri | 2 | 2 | New Delhi |
| Sachin Sharma | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| Sadasivan | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| Sagar | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Sagar Agnihotri | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Sagar Bansal | 2 | 2 | Mumbai, New Delhi |
| Sagar Wagle | 3 | 3 | Mumbai |
| Sahib Kochar | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Sahil | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Sahil Chandra | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| Sahil Lohan | 1 | 2 | Chandigarh |
| Sahil Mahajan | 3 | 3 | Mumbai |
| Sahil Memon | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| Sahil Sethi | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Sahila Bhatia | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Saiba M. Rajpal Sr. Adv. | 2 | 3 | New Delhi |
| Saiee N | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| Sailesh Mishra | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| Saini Keshav Rao | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| Saini Keshava Rao | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| Saiyed Sahil M. Nagamiya | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| Sajal Jain | 2 | 2 | Chandigarh, New Delhi |
| Sajeve Bhushan Deora | 2 | 2 | New Delhi |
| Sajeve Deora | 2 | 3 | New Delhi |
| Saji P John | 3 | 4 | Bengaluru |
| Sajjan Kumar Dokania | 3 | 3 | New Delhi, Ahmedabad |
| Saket | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Saket Chaudhary | 1 | 1 | Kolkata |
| Saket Mone | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
| Saket Saroha | 1 | 1 | New Delhi |
| Saketh Movva | 1 | 1 | Hyderabad |
| Sakil Ansari | 1 | 1 | Mumbai |
Companies = distinct corporate debtors the advocate is named against. Orders = distinct tribunal orders their name was read from. Bench is the bench of the CASE, not of the hearing. How each case ended is on the advocate’s own page, free, and across the whole list in the directory.
Where this comes from. Advocate names are read from the appearance block printed at the head of tribunal orders, across admission orders (3,524) · liquidation orders (2,278) · resolution orders (1,176) · plan-approval orders (528) · scanned resolution orders (245). No name is inferred and none is matched to a register, because none exists. Methodology · Report an error.